dmb said:
Again, the question is only whether or not logical contradictions are bad.
Marsha replied:
Are they? Hmmm. It depends on context.
”The problem lies in the fact that Western intellectual history has been intent
upon creating an understanding that is founded upon universal laws, and, in
order to create such universal laws, we have attempted to eliminate all objects
of thought to which such laws do not universal apply. This, however, is
irrational since there obviously are dynamic and holistic objects of thought to
which the laws of thought do not universally apply."
dmb says:
This quote does not apply. The problem described in this quote is not relevant
to the question. The universal laws of thought are associated with Platonism
and the correspondence theory of truth. The MOQ rejects all that and so do I.
But the question remains and the answer is totally obvious; are logical
contradictions bad or not? Yes, of course they are. And given the context, your
contradictory use of the MOQ's key terms in a MOQ discussion group, that
particular contradiction is very, very bad.
This is just another case wherein you foolishly misapply quotes that you don't
understand. Does the MOQ even have objects of conception? I don't think so.
Objects ARE concepts.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
