Ant, I look forward to reading Paul Turner's paper.
Marsha On May 28, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Ant McWatt <[email protected]> wrote: > Marsha, > > Paul Turner has just sent me a short paper about there being two perspectives > (or as Paul terms it, "two contexts") of the MOQ. I don't think there's an > identity with the two perspectives that you talk about below (as Paul's > "perspectives" are both purely intellectual patterns) but his paper will be > uploaded at robertpirsig.org in the next week so you (and everyone who reads > this, of course!) can take a look yourself. > > Best wishes, > > Ant > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Marsha V stated May 27th 2013: > > I take the two-view perspective of the MOQ. One view is the MOQ as the > intellectual/conceptual metaphysical system, with all its examples and > supporting explanation, which was presented by RMP in 'LILA' and with > interviews, text and letters; and there is the MoQ as Reality = Quality > (Dynamic/static), or as I prefer to think of it: > Value(unpatterned/patterned). In the second view, I am saying that the > Metaphysics of Quality denotes Reality = Value(Dynamic/static). Metaphysics > as first, or fundamental, principle. --- The first view might be explained as > 'pointing to the moon', and the second view as 'direct experience.' > > >> On 5/27/13 11:56 AM, "Ant McWatt" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> To keep it simple, the MOQ is purely an intellectual pattern. [It's just >> resides on] the fourth level if you like. The fifth level (whatever that >> will be...) hasn't evolved yet (although maybe it's already arrived in the >> form of little green men!)... > > > . Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
