Hi again Joe,

I also think it best to consider static patterns of value from two different 
points of view. The first would be the nature of all patterns:  co-dependent, 
impermanent and ever-changing. All static patterns, due to the  relationship 
with the consciousness (perceptual and conceptual), are a product of 
reification as knower and known; language just reflects this.  Processes are 
decontextualized and temporarily encapsulated or “frozen” by reification to 
form patterns.  --------------  A second point-of-view would be by categorizing 
patterns into evolutionary function  - inorganic, biological, social and 
intellectual – into the MoQ's four-level, hierarchical structure. 


Marsha


On May 29, 2013, at 11:08 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:


Hi Joe,

Yes, that's it.  I _experience_ the two-view perspective of the MoQ.  Firstly, 
there is the MoQ as the intellectual/conceptual metaphysical system, with all 
its examples and supporting explanation, which was presented by RMP in 'LILA' 
and with interviews, text and letters; and there is the MoQ as Reality = 
Quality (Dynamic/static), or as I prefer to think of it:  
Value(unpatterned/patterned).  In this second view, I am saying that the 
Metaphysics of Quality denotes Reality = Quality(Dynamic/static).  Metaphysics 
as first, or fundamental, principle. ---  The first view might be explained as 
'pointing to the moon', and the second view as 'direct experience.'

It's interesting that you consider a half step to be a shock.  Don't those 
shocks move with the scale?  


Marsha



On May 29, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Joseph  Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi MarshaV
> 
> I take the nine-view musical perspective of the MOQ.  Do, Re, Mi, (shock),
> Fa, Sol, La, Ti, (shock), Do.
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> On 5/27/13 8:21 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I take the two-view perspective of the MoQ.
> 
> 
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to