On Jul 23, 2013, at 1:25 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
> dmb says: > Seems to me that Marsha is really saying is that philosophical discussion is > beneath her. She wants to construe her inability to discuss ideas as some > kind of virtue, a virtue so awesome that mere mortals like us can't even > imagine it. Marsha before: To put it another way, this is your thought. It's not a fearsome thought, but just your thought, your projection. It's a thought that arose, and then it ceased; there's nothing in it. It is a condition of your mind, not my psychological problem. Marsha: Thoughts arise, thoughts cease; there is nothing in them, nothing in any thought. It is just movement of the mind. One doesn't need to make it personal by grasping it, attaching to it, believing it. This is there for you to see, if you will only look. If a metaphysics is a theory about reality, you might want to take a look. As both the Buddha and RMP say, see for yourself. Or do you suppose namedropping 'Heidegger' in a sentence makes you a philosopher? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
