Hi Marsha

I think that much of what you say below is a result of prior unwillingness to engage in discussions which has raised tempers and, consequently resulted in, for want of a better phrase, a slanging match! If this is to change then it will take an effort by all concerned (not just yourself) to take a step back, take a deep breath and re-engage in a reasonable, rational and measured way. No insults, sarcasm, parody, misrepresentation etc.and no prevarication, sidestepping, dismissal or evasion.

There has been far too much acrimony (on both sides) in the past and this needs to stop.

May I suggest that, if you are now prepared to engage meaningfully with others on this forum, then both yourself and anyone else involved take one point at a time and consider only that point until you have at least some idea of where you agree or disagree. I would also suggest that, given the four posts a day limit currently in force, that everyone involved in the discussions limit their responses apprpriately in order that you are all able to answer questions and criticisms made. I will be quite happy to increase the post limitations, either individually or overall, if it is required or necessary.

Please remember (all of you) that moq_discuss is the ONLY forum on the internet that works AND is exclusive to the MoQ and Robert Pirsigs work. So please exercise restraint and enter into the discussions in a fair and reasonable way.

Horse





On 19/09/2013 10:28, MarshaV wrote:
Horse,

I do not feel obliged to defend myself against projections, misrepresentations, 
sarcasm, irony, parody and insults, which does not represent a fair discussion.  
For example, I should argue that I am not a postmodernism psychopath?  I cannot 
relate to dmb's complaints or accusations within any statement I have ever made.  
If he would present my exact statements and cite the precise post (subject and 
time&date) as context, I will try to explain.

Recently I wrote to dmb:


On Sep 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, MarshaV wrote:

Until you can admit that you might be wrong, that you might need correcting, 
you will never learn. In other words, you will never learn.
Wrong about your misrepresentations?  For example, you've repeatedly said that 
I don't understand the difference between Dynamic Quality and static quality.  
I have forever said that the difference is Dynamic Quality is unpatterned, 
while static quality is patterned?  Am I wrong?

---

Where was the answer to my question?
Marsha



--

"Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines 
or dates by which bills must be paid."
— Frank Zappa

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to