Platt,
I was kinda grasping at straws but the concept is to somehow get outside
of it. I was
Thin'n that if you cut energy out of the picture as far as measurement
and be able to
Measure it's displacement instead, that one could then see outside the
loop and by-pass
Hiesenburgs uncertainty theory alltogether. One could measure energy
with out using energy
If you get my meaning. How one would do this? You got me, but it's a new
direction to think.
-Ron

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 4:39 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MD] Art of Value

Quoting Ron Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> So, using subjective awareness to find objective truth will result in 
> a loop every time Knowing this, new ways should be explored to evolve 
> sensory inputs that use the detection Of spacial distortion rather 
> than energy emission and reflection. Or any other method Of detection 
> of phenomena other than the use of energy.

You may be on to something, but I don't understand how "space
distortion" (whatever that is) is going to solve the problem of
recursion or "loops." If we think of reality as value or morality
instead of various forms of physical energy, a lot of what you find
problematical fades away. Or, so it seems to me. But, I could be wrong.


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to