Of course the word for "betterness" as the principle driving evolution is usually "Fitness" .... or quality, or value, ...
Much misundersood word "fitness", which is why alternatives are useful. Ian On 5/3/07, Krimel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [Krimel] > > > It seems kind of self serving to state, as a creature already evolved > from > > > swamp scum, that this is a better station than that. But it is the > height > > > of vanity to go on to assert that not only is it better; but my version > of > > > 'betterness' is a universal principle. And this principle of > 'betterness' > > > is a driving force in evolution. > > > > I gather you think it's better not to be so vain as to think your version > > of betterness is better than anyone else's. > > > > [Krimel] > > No I think "betterness" is not a word and for good reason. > > [Platt] > You seem to think it's better that "betterness" is not a word and better to > to have good reason. > > [Krimel] > Why is what you think about what I think worth talking about? > > > > > moq_discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
