dmb says: Huh? The world transcends experience? I thought the MOQ asserts approximately the opposite. It equates experience with reality. Anything outside of experience is pure fiction. Isn't that the basic idea of radical empiricism; reality is limited to experience and no experience is excluded from reality. You can't ignore anything nor make anything up. I find this to
be exceedingly reasonable. A transcendent world? I think Krimel was right to conjure up Kant's things-in-themselves. [Krimel] I should not be repeating myself like this, but this is a slightly edited version of what I just posted to DM in the cyberspace thread. I think it applies: I whole heartedly agree that all we have is our individual experience, our individual realities. But I am equally willing to say, purely as a matter of faith, that I believe we have experience "OF" something. That our realities are constructed as representations "OF" something. Call it TiTs. Call it objectivity. Call it Other. When the Hindus speak of Maya and the world as illusion I would say they are referring to the confusion we experience when we confuse our individual representation with that indefinable stuff that is independent of us. I like to think of it as DQ. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
