[dmb]
> A transcendent world? I think Krimel was right to
> conjure up Kant's
> things-in-themselves.
>
> [Krimel]
> I should not be repeating myself like this, but this
> is a slightly edited
> version of what I just posted to DM in the
> cyberspace thread. I think it
> applies:
> I whole heartedly agree that all we have is our
> individual experience, our
> individual realities. But I am equally willing to
> say, purely as a matter of
> faith, that I believe we have experience "OF"
> something. That our realities
> are constructed as representations "OF" something.
> Call it TiTs. Call it objectivity. Call it Other.
Isn't this also saying that when I see a tree,
another human being, or a bird, etc... they could
easily see me as another human being, and notice a
tree or a bird, etc...
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
