> If its placed some where to dump it then developers are notified you
> don't want to go there unless you want to waste your time listening to
> what possible end users want. Then yes.
Philip, how many times? :-) _Right_Now_, the developers are up to their
eyes in work, and will be until Mozilla 1.0. The priorities for this
release are well-established (API freeze, language spec freeze, reduced
footprint, better performance, bugfixes etc.) and are not going to change.
It's a harsh fact of life, but if the above is not what users want, then
they are going to be wanting a long time, and shouting at developers won't
help. (Most of them have already fled this group because of the high level
of wibble.) If it _is_ what they want, then they have to sit back and wait
for it to happen.
If you are determined that end-users should be encouraged to continue to
do those things we are trying to stop them doing, then developers will
simply find another, spam-free way to communicate (such as private mail)
and we will all suffer from that.
> End users of "Mozilla" could be HP, AOL, IBM, schools/universities,
> businesses with IS departments; who might want to customize the look or
> add or take away features.
I would argue to a large extent that those last two are end users of
Netscape 6 or Beonex, not Mozilla. And HP, AOL and IBM are not in the
habit of spamming newsgroups and Bugzilla with questions.
Gerv
