> > Will it be like this forever? Isn't Mozilla at some > > point going to be a browser for regular users as > > well? > > Yes to #1, no to #2. Mozilla is intended to be > packaged by other companies for the user market. > The builds provided by Mozilla are just for > testing purposes, and will be even post-1.0. What's the point of an 'installer' version of mozilla then ?? That makes it awfully easy for end-users to download and use. I would think that a re-packager would take care of an installer program for their branded version of mozilla, wouldn't you ?? Hall
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Richter
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 JTK
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Garth Wallace
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Garth Wallace
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 JTK
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Ian Davey
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 jesus X
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
