>>Yes to #1, no to #2. Mozilla is intended to be >>packaged by other companies for the user market. >>The builds provided by Mozilla are just for >>testing purposes, and will be even post-1.0. > > One word: Why? Because for it to be any other way, Mozilla would require a marketing department and an end-user support apparatus, neither of which it has. Gerv
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Richter
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 JTK
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Garth Wallace
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Garth Wallace
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 JTK
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Ian Davey
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 jesus X
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Gervase Markham
