Garth Wallace wrote:
>
> "Jonas J�rgensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Asa Dotzler wrote:
> > > That's fine. Mozilla isn't for the regular users. Regular users should
> > > be looking for Mozilla distributions like Netscape 6.x, Beonex
> > > Communicator, HallZilla, etc. Mozilla.org provided binaries for testing
> > > and development purposes. It's fine with me if users go with Netscape
> > > 6.x instead of Mozilla because they consider 6.x to be newer and better
> > > than 1.0. A Netscape release gets the user agent out there just as well
> > > (maybe even better with commercial support and additional features like
> > > IM) as a Mozilla binary :)
> >
> > Will it be like this forever? Isn't Mozilla at some point going to be a
> > browser for regular users as well?
>
> Yes to #1, no to #2. Mozilla is intended to be
> packaged by other companies for the user market.
> The builds provided by Mozilla are just for
> testing purposes, and will be even post-1.0.
One word: Why?
