"JTK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What I find rather odd is that while many here cry > "Mozilla isn't for users!", Netscape 6.x, which is no more than Mozilla > with an AOL sticker on it, is supposed to be the "Mozila for end users". Evidently JTK hasn't discovered an interesting linguistic property known as "context". The builds provided by Mozilla are not intended for end-users. The code produced by the Mozilla project is not written for immediate consumption by end users. However, it is written with the understanding that other groups will package it for use by end-users.
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jeroen Roeterd
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Richter
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 JTK
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Garth Wallace
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Garth Wallace
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Jonas J�rgensen
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Gervase Markham
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Hall Stevenson
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 JTK
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Asa Dotzler
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Ian Davey
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.
- Re: Mozilla 1.0? Shouldn't it be 5.0 Gervase Markham
