Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Hardware reccomendation

[Ivo]

> > > Computational speed, and cache size seem to be the most important
> > > factors.  But anything you buy today will have no problem encoding
> > > (even with "lame -h") at faster than real time.  
> > > My 600mhz athalon is about 5x.

The ~0.3x I get on my Pentium 133Mhz is with -h and CBR, but my surprise
is at the realtime ability of a 200Mhz... I mean, 200/133 != 3 ;)
Even so, 266/133 != 3 neither...
What's the cause of this, or am I wrong here that 200Mhz can reach realtime?

Ivo

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )