My friend has a P166, 64 MB of RAM, he got .80 or so with -h, .90 with it
off and 1.3 with -f. I had a P200, 128 MB of RAM, and I got realtime
with -h. With the 233 I have now it's not much faster.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Ivo
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2000 7:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Hardware reccomendation
> > > Computational speed, and cache size seem to be the most important
> > > factors. But anything you buy today will have no problem encoding
> > > (even with "lame -h") at faster than real time.
> > > My 600mhz athalon is about 5x.
The ~0.3x I get on my Pentium 133Mhz is with -h and CBR, but my surprise
is at the realtime ability of a 200Mhz... I mean, 200/133 != 3 ;)
Even so, 266/133 != 3 neither...
What's the cause of this, or am I wrong here that 200Mhz can reach realtime?
Ivo
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
