Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison

[E. Zann]

Hi Naoki,

Ross>> Your joking aren't you? It uses about 5
Ross>> times more CPU than in_mp3. On K6-200 ...

NS> The CPU load highly depends on performance of
NS> FPU. Since K6's FPU is much worse than Pentium
NS> II's ...

I'm running in_mpg13.dll on AuthenticAMD AMD-K6tm
w/ multimedia extensions and my CPU load is just a
little bit (5% or so) more than in case of Nitrane,
but significantly (can't come up with a number,
though) less than in case of FhG-based in_mp3.dll.

And I like the way in_mpg12.dll sounds better than
both Nitrane and FhG, anyway. So, thanks a lot,
Naoki ! :)

Greetings,
-E.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )