Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison

[Steve Lhomme]

The bug in Winamp and I also figured out it is a bit faster (less CPU use).
I couldn't really hear the difference anyway...

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cavallo de Cavallis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison


> > Are you sure of that ? Because I use Winamp but with the in_mpg123 output instead
> > of the included MP3 decoder (which is also faster). in_mpg123 is a Winamp port
> > of MPG123 and it works fine with the VBR+CRC MP3 I encode.
> > 
> what make u choose the in_mpg123 solution ?

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )