Cavallo de Cavallis wrote:
> what make u choose the in_mpg123 solution ?
Steve Lhomme wrote:
> The bug in Winamp and I also figured out it is a bit faster
> (less CPU use).
Your joking aren't you? It uses about 5 times more CPU than in_mp3. On the old machine I use it on (K6-200), in_mpg123 uses about 50% of CPU where in_mp3 is about 10%. The advantage is slightly better sound quality.
Ross.
