>> In http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~djmrob/mp3decoders/index.html >>there's a comparison of mp3 decoders. Lame is one of the three that >passed >>the test (the other two are Winamp 2.22 and Ultra Player). But mpg123 >is >>not tested. What about it? Does anyone know any decoding problem with >it? > >Yes, don't even try to decode a VBR MP3 with CRC data with mpg123. Just >won't work. Don't forget that Winamp isn't flawless - there's a link to >a known bug on the LAME home page. Are you sure of that ? Because I use Winamp but with the in_mpg123 output instead of the included MP3 decoder (which is also faster). in_mpg123 is a Winamp port of MPG123 and it works fine with the VBR+CRC MP3 I encode. http://www.uuuu.org -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Alberto Garc�a
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison David Bridson
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Alberto Garc�a
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison mailing-steve
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Cavallo de Cavallis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Steve Lhomme
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Naoki Shibata
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparis... E. Zann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder compari... David Balazic
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison Ross Levis
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison David Brown
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison David Balazic
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison David Brown
