At 03:54 PM 9/21/2000 -0500, timothy connolly wrote:
>
>Furthermore, I gather from the snide tone of your
>remarks that you are quite O.K. with intimidation. I
>find it equally offensive.
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
>You are arguing for a return to the old west.
Hey, ease up folks, Connie did not say that she favored what
happened, she just asked for clarification - which is understandable
given Tim's original post.
Please don't read things into people's questions. When a group
sits around saying "this is bad", and one person asks "what exactly
is bad about it?", that one person may disagree - or may really want
more information about why something is so worthy of condemnation.
We can't have useful discussions if folks are more interested in
bashing perceived disagreement than in finding out what others think.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Steven C. Anderson Longfellow area of Minneapolis
http://www.SteveAnderson.org
