Re: affordable housing, Bill Cullen from Hopkins suggests that Section 8 rent subsidies might be more effective than publicly subsidized new construction: > Given the increasing vacancy rate, isn't increasing the availability of > vouchers (ala Section 8) a better solution than building more apartment > complexes? Do you know there is a multi-year waiting list for section 8 > vouchers - the list is so long that they are no longer adding names? (my > experience is with St. Paul PHA, I am unsure if Minneapolis PHA > has the same > problem).
[MH] Seems likely, given the fact that operation, maintenance and taxes are paid by the private landlord when Section 8 vouchers are used. The rent subsidies also allow renters a degree of locational flexibility. I imagine there are problems with which sources of funds are available, i.e. funds to subsidize new construction vs. direct rent subsidies, federal vs. state vs. local funds, etc. Also, I believe many landlords dislike the Section 8 program. Any comments from knowledgeable government folks (MCDA, MPHA, state/local folks, etc.) and private landlords? Craig, Vicky, Keith...? Michael Hohmann Linden Hills
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
