I think you make some good points here Bill.  I know
that numerous other places I've lived and sat on local
community boards dealing with discrimination and on
others dealing with housing that there were highly
different norms than there are here.

First of all, no place else I've lived held landlords
accountable for the activities of their residents
unless if there was a clear demonstration of intent to
enable criminal activity.

Secondly, some other places I've lived it was illegal
to discriminate in housing on the basis of one's
history with the criminal justice or public assistance
systems.  This type of discrimination seems to be
encouraged by the system we have here.  There appears
to be far less of the opinion that if someone has the
done the time for the crime that they've paid their
debt to society and should not be subjected to further
punishment.

There appears to be a noxious classism underlying the
idea that people who rent need to have their
activities monitored by their landlord as if all
rental properties are really minimum security prisons
to contain the power and minorities.

Note that these issues are unlikely to be a problem
for those who can afford more expensive apartments in
the community.

I'd be interested in exploring the history of these
public policy decisions and see if there are disparate
impacts on those populations that comprise our
communities homeless.

David Strand
Loring Park


--- Bill Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> It seems that many of us equate "homelessness" with
> "lack of housing."  This
> had merit when housing was tight in 2001, but on
> 8-Jan-03 the Star Tribune
> reported that vacancy rates have increased to 6.6%
> in the metro area.  The
> article said "Leasing agents say this is the worst
> market they've seen in
> more than a decade and they're offering a variety of
> rent specials" to
> attract residents.    This survey included 124,000
> apartments - meaning the
> surveyors located approximately 8100 apartments
> vacant right now.
> 
> This data implies a problem different than
> availability.  Are landlords
> discriminating?  Is one's income too low to afford
> rent?  Is one's history
> (drugs, crime, etc) preventing them from passing a
> rental application?  Is
> it something I have missed?
> 
> I certainly don't mean to be callous or point
> fingers, I just want to make
> sure we understand the problem before we propose
> solutions.
> 
> Regards, Bill Cullen
> Hopkins -- Landlord
> 
> 
> TEMPORARY REMINDER:
> 1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
> 2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as
> possible.
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic
> Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
> Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to