Laura Waterman Wittstock wrote:

> I don't see any objection at all to an adult smoking as much as he or 
> she wants in a space that is not affecting other people.

What if all of the people in that space have agreed to
accept the risk of secondhand smoke?
 
> Smoking bans protect the 80% majority of non-smokers from the 
> unhealthy effects of second-hand smoke. Smoking in public 
> places is that which takes choice away, not the other way around.

A large percentage of the 80% majority of non-smokers never set foot
in many of the places that the smoking ban effects.

Michael Atherton
Prospect Park




REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If 
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.

2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn 
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to