I am not sure about the terminology but let'say:

- Staticaly Linking = use libX11.so = store some data in ELF, more safe...

- Dynamicaly Linking = use libX11.so.6 = more freedom, can use dynlib....

That said, both linkings have advantages.

And I am not sure for libX11 that Staticaly Linking is the one I would

So, IMHO and, please, without opening any war, I would vote in a utopic
world for a compiler that gives me the choice.

Or to link libX11 in my program Staticaly or Dynamicaly.

But, yes, I agree, it is twice the work to develop the package (and twice
problems to debug it).

But do not worry, this will never append for fpc.


View this message in context: 
Sent from the mseide-msegui-talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
mseide-msegui-talk mailing list

Reply via email to