Re: why is mutt better?

[Lars Hecking]

J McKitrick writes:
> I just got in a debate over email clients, and my windows friend
> argues anything i can do in mutt, he can do in TheBat! just as easily.
> I checked the feature list, and it is extensive.  Most of what mutt
> offers, thebat offers.  Why is the advantage of mutt, or any
> text-based email client?

 - mutt is a text-based client; this is a huge advantage for me, as
   I tend to type emails, not click them

 - does thebat support gpg (it seems, not)

 - mutt is Free Software