nashorn-dev  

Messages by Thread

• Review request for JDK-8129950: Wrong condition for checking absence of logger in MethodHandleFactory Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8129950: Wrong condition for checking absence of logger in MethodHandleFactory Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8129950: Wrong condition for checking absence of logger in MethodHandleFactory Marcus Lagergren
• stdin parameter of $EXEC Anthony Vanelverdinghe
  • Re: stdin parameter of $EXEC Michael Haupt
• Re: RFR: 8098547: (tz) Support tzdata2015e Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR: 8098547: (tz) Support tzdata2015e Seán Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8098547: (tz) Support tzdata2015e Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR: 8098547: (tz) Support tzdata2015e Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8098547: (tz) Support tzdata2015e Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR: 8098547: (tz) Support tzdata2015e Aleksej Efimov
• JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8129597: Add tier 3 test definitions to the JDK 9 forest joe darcy
  • Re: JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8129597: Add tier 3 test definitions to the JDK 9 forest Stuart Marks
• Re: Nashorn Octane JMH code publicly available? Volker Simonis
  • Re: Nashorn Octane JMH code publicly available? Marcus Lagergren
  • Re: Nashorn Octane JMH code publicly available? Chris Newland
  • Re: Nashorn Octane JMH code publicly available? Volker Simonis
  • Re: Nashorn Octane JMH code publicly available? Marcus Lagergren
  • Re: Nashorn Octane JMH code publicly available? Chris Newland
• Review request for JDK-8129410: Java adapters with class-level overrides should preserve variable arity constructors Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8129410: Java adapters with class-level overrides should preserve variable arity constructors A. Sundararajan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8129410: Java adapters with class-level overrides should preserve variable arity constructors Marcus Lagergren
• Nasgen: typos patch Ahmed Ashour
  • Re: Nasgen: typos patch A. Sundararajan
• RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs A. Sundararajan
  • RE: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs Ben Evans
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs Erik Joelsson
• RFR 8117883: nasgen prototype, instance member count calculation is wrong A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR 8117883: nasgen prototype, instance member count calculation is wrong Ahmed Ashour
  • Re: RFR 8117883: nasgen prototype, instance member count calculation is wrong A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR 8117883: nasgen prototype, instance member count calculation is wrong Ahmed Ashour
  • Re: RFR 8117883: nasgen prototype, instance member count calculation is wrong A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR 8117883: nasgen prototype, instance member count calculation is wrong Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR 8117883: nasgen prototype, instance member count calculation is wrong Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR 8117883: nasgen prototype, instance member count calculation is wrong Ahmed Ashour
  • Re: RFR 8117883: nasgen prototype, instance member count calculation is wrong A. Sundararajan
• Nasgen: static initializer prefix: member count is sometimes 1 more than what is needed Ahmed Ashour
  • Re: Nasgen: static initializer prefix: member count is sometimes 1 more than what is needed A. Sundararajan
• RFR 8098847: obj."prop" and obj.'prop' should result in SyntaxError A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR 8098847: obj."prop" and obj.'prop' should result in SyntaxError Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR 8098847: obj."prop" and obj.'prop' should result in SyntaxError Attila Szegedi
• a few minor bugs Andreas Woess
  • Re: a few minor bugs A. Sundararajan
• Review request for JDK-8098808: Convert Scope from interface to class Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8098808: Convert Scope from interface to class A. Sundararajan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8098808: Convert Scope from interface to class Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8098808: Convert Scope from interface to class Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8098808: Convert Scope from interface to class Hannes Wallnoefer
• Review request for JDK-8098807: Strict eval throws ClassCastException with large scripts Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8098807: Strict eval throws ClassCastException with large scripts A. Sundararajan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8098807: Strict eval throws ClassCastException with large scripts Attila Szegedi
• RFR 8098578: Global scope is not accessible with indirect load call A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR 8098578: Global scope is not accessible with indirect load call Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR 8098578: Global scope is not accessible with indirect load call A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR 8098578: Global scope is not accessible with indirect load call Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR 8098578: Global scope is not accessible with indirect load call Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR 8098578: Global scope is not accessible with indirect load call A. Sundararajan
• Review request for JDK-8098546: eval within a 'with' leaks definitions into global scope Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8098546: eval within a 'with' leaks definitions into global scope Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8098546: eval within a 'with' leaks definitions into global scope A. Sundararajan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8098546: eval within a 'with' leaks definitions into global scope Attila Szegedi
• Review request for JDK-8087312: PropertyMapWrapper.equals should compare className Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8087312: PropertyMapWrapper.equals should compare className A. Sundararajan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8087312: PropertyMapWrapper.equals should compare className Attila Szegedi
• Review request for JDK-8086052: Script evaluation should not return last function declaration Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8086052: Script evaluation should not return last function declaration A. Sundararajan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8086052: Script evaluation should not return last function declaration Attila Szegedi
• ability to inject custom properties into a JS object Radu Cotescu
  • Re: ability to inject custom properties into a JS object A. Sundararajan
  • Re: ability to inject custom properties into a JS object Radu Cotescu
  • Re: ability to inject custom properties into a JS object A. Sundararajan
• Nashorn caches compiled code? Can I clear the cache? Kaj Magnus Lindberg
  • Re: Nashorn caches compiled code? Can I clear the cache? Attila Szegedi
• RFR 8087211: Indirect evals should be strict with -strict option A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR 8087211: Indirect evals should be strict with -strict option Marcus Lagergren
  • Re: RFR 8087211: Indirect evals should be strict with -strict option Hannes Wallnoefer
• RFR 8087136: regression: apply on $EXEC fails with ClassCastException A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR 8087136: regression: apply on $EXEC fails with ClassCastException Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR 8087136: regression: apply on $EXEC fails with ClassCastException Marcus Lagergren
• Has --dump-debug-dir behaviour changed in JDK9? Chris Newland
  • Re: Has --dump-debug-dir behaviour changed in JDK9? A. Sundararajan
  • Re: Has --dump-debug-dir behaviour changed in JDK9? Chris Newland
  • Re: Has --dump-debug-dir behaviour changed in JDK9? A. Sundararajan
  • Re: Has --dump-debug-dir behaviour changed in JDK9? Marcus Lagergren
• Proposal for reworking Java adapters Attila Szegedi
• Re: Data corruption with Nashorn + Handlebars and concurrent requests Matt Kime
  • Re: Data corruption with Nashorn + Handlebars and concurrent requests Sebastien Deleuze
  • Re: Data corruption with Nashorn + Handlebars and concurrent requests Matt Kime
  • Re: Data corruption with Nashorn + Handlebars and concurrent requests A. Sundararajan
  • Re: Data corruption with Nashorn + Handlebars and concurrent requests Sebastien Deleuze
  • Re: Data corruption with Nashorn + Handlebars and concurrent requests Sundararajan Athijegannathan
• RFR 8086032: Add compiler error tests when syntax extensions are used with --no-syntax-extensions option A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR 8086032: Add compiler error tests when syntax extensions are used with --no-syntax-extensions option Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR 8086032: Add compiler error tests when syntax extensions are used with --no-syntax-extensions option A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR 8086032: Add compiler error tests when syntax extensions are used with --no-syntax-extensions option A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR 8086032: Add compiler error tests when syntax extensions are used with --no-syntax-extensions option Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR 8086032: Add compiler error tests when syntax extensions are used with --no-syntax-extensions option Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR 8086032: Add compiler error tests when syntax extensions are used with --no-syntax-extensions option Attila Szegedi
• FYI, make file support for tiered testing targets underway, JDK-8075571: Support tiered testing make targets Joseph D. Darcy
• Help us make Nashorn great: 8u60 Rampdown 2 draws near Attila Szegedi
• RFR(S): 8080490: add $EXECV command to Nashorn scripting mode Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR(S): 8080490: add $EXECV command to Nashorn scripting mode Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR(S): 8080490: add $EXECV command to Nashorn scripting mode Hannes Wallnoefer
• [8u60] 8085937: add autoimports sample script to easily explore Java classes in interactive mode A. Sundararajan
  • Re: [8u60] 8085937: add autoimports sample script to easily explore Java classes in interactive mode Marcus Lagergren
  • Re: [8u60] 8085937: add autoimports sample script to easily explore Java classes in interactive mode Rob McKenna
• RFR (M): 8085885: address Javadoc warnings in Nashorn source code Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR (M): 8085885: address Javadoc warnings in Nashorn source code Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR (M): 8085885: address Javadoc warnings in Nashorn source code Marcus Lagergren
• RFR 8085937: add autoimports sample script to easily explore Java classes in interactive mode A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR 8085937: add autoimports sample script to easily explore Java classes in interactive mode Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR 8085937: add autoimports sample script to easily explore Java classes in interactive mode Marcus Lagergren
  • Re: RFR 8085937: add autoimports sample script to easily explore Java classes in interactive mode Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR 8085937: add autoimports sample script to easily explore Java classes in interactive mode A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR 8085937: add autoimports sample script to easily explore Java classes in interactive mode Marcus Lagergren
• RFR 8085802: Nashorn -nse option causes parse error on anonymous function definition A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR 8085802: Nashorn -nse option causes parse error on anonymous function definition Marcus Lagergren
  • Re: RFR 8085802: Nashorn -nse option causes parse error on anonymous function definition Attila Szegedi
• [8u60] approval request for 8085810: Return value of Objects.requireNonNull call can be used A. Sundararajan
  • Re: [8u60] approval request for 8085810: Return value of Objects.requireNonNull call can be used Rob McKenna
  • Re: [8u60] approval request for 8085810: Return value of Objects.requireNonNull call can be used Attila Szegedi
• RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Daniel D. Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Kumar Srinivasan
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Daniel D. Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Alejandro E Murillo
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Claes Redestad
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8085822 JEP 223: New Version-String Scheme (initial integration) Erik Joelsson
• RFR (S): 8080087: Nashorn $ENV.PWD is originally undefined Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR (S): 8080087: Nashorn $ENV.PWD is originally undefined A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR (S): 8080087: Nashorn $ENV.PWD is originally undefined Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR (S): 8080087: Nashorn $ENV.PWD is originally undefined Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR (S): 8080087: Nashorn $ENV.PWD is originally undefined A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR (S): 8080087: Nashorn $ENV.PWD is originally undefined A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR (S): 8080087: Nashorn $ENV.PWD is originally undefined Marcus Lagergren
• [8u60] approval request for 8081809: Missing final modifier in method parameters (nashorn code convention) A. Sundararajan
  • Re: [8u60] approval request for 8081809: Missing final modifier in method parameters (nashorn code convention) Seán Coffey
  • Re: [8u60] approval request for 8081809: Missing final modifier in method parameters (nashorn code convention) Attila Szegedi
  • Re: [8u60] approval request for 8081809: Missing final modifier in method parameters (nashorn code convention) Marcus Lagergren
• RFR 8085810: Return value of Objects.requireNonNull call can be used A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR 8085810: Return value of Objects.requireNonNull call can be used Marcus Lagergren
  • Re: RFR 8085810: Return value of Objects.requireNonNull call can be used Attila Szegedi
• Constant propagation in Nashorn compiler pipeline Attila Szegedi
• Review request for JDK-8081813: JSONListAdapter should delegate its [[DefaultValue]] to wrapped object Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8081813: JSONListAdapter should delegate its [[DefaultValue]] to wrapped object Marcus Lagergren
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8081813: JSONListAdapter should delegate its [[DefaultValue]] to wrapped object A. Sundararajan
• RFR 8081809: Missing final modifier in method parameters (nashorn code convention) A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR 8081809: Missing final modifier in method parameters (nashorn code convention) Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR 8081809: Missing final modifier in method parameters (nashorn code convention) Hannes Wallnoefer
• RFR (XS): 8081696: reduce dependency of Nashorn tests on external components Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR (XS): 8081696: reduce dependency of Nashorn tests on external components Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR (XS): 8081696: reduce dependency of Nashorn tests on external components A. Sundararajan
• Review request for JDK-8066220: Fuzzing bug: MethodHandle bug (Object, Object) != (boolean)Object Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8066220: Fuzzing bug: MethodHandle bug (Object, Object) != (boolean)Object Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8066220: Fuzzing bug: MethodHandle bug (Object, Object) != (boolean)Object A. Sundararajan
• RFR (XS): 8081668: fix Nashorn ant externals command Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR (XS): 8081668: fix Nashorn ant externals command Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR (XS): 8081668: fix Nashorn ant externals command A. Sundararajan
• RFR (S): 8080275: transparently download testng.jar for Nashorn testing Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR (S): 8080275: transparently download testng.jar for Nashorn testing Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: RFR (S): 8080275: transparently download testng.jar for Nashorn testing A. Sundararajan
• Re: Review request for JDK-8066773: JSON-friendly wrapper for objects Attila Szegedi
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8066773: JSON-friendly wrapper for objects A. Sundararajan
  • Re: Review request for JDK-8066773: JSON-friendly wrapper for objects Marcus Lagergren
• RFR (XS): 8081604: rename ScriptingFunctions.tokenizeCommandLine Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR (XS): 8081604: rename ScriptingFunctions.tokenizeCommandLine A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR (XS): 8081604: rename ScriptingFunctions.tokenizeCommandLine Attila Szegedi
  • Re: RFR (XS): 8081604: rename ScriptingFunctions.tokenizeCommandLine Marcus Lagergren
• RFR (XS): 8081603: erroneous dot file generated from Nashorn --print-code Michael Haupt
  • Re: RFR (XS): 8081603: erroneous dot file generated from Nashorn --print-code A. Sundararajan
  • Re: RFR (XS): 8081603: erroneous dot file generated from Nashorn --print-code Marcus Lagergren
  • Re: RFR (XS): 8081603: erroneous dot file generated from Nashorn --print-code Attila Szegedi
• Re: RFR 8081609: engine.eval call from a java method which was called from a previous engine.eval results in wrong ScriptContext being used. Marcus Lagergren
• Re: JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8075555:Add tiered testing definitions to the nashorn repo Marcus Lagergren
  • Re: JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8075555:Add tiered testing definitions to the nashorn repo A. Sundararajan

• Later messages