On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:01 AM, renuka prasad <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:59 AM, A. Mani <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Sunil Abraham <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > The problem with the IOTA CBT is that they are assuming that we need a >> Flash >> > like experience for learning. This indicates a poor understanding of >> > pedagogy. If the focus is on bells and whistles then the student will >> > usually circumvent the material. I have seen this at many ICT4D >> projects. >> > The key is too keep it simple so that emphasis remains on the key >> learnings >> > for each lesson. Web interfaces should be sufficient in most cases. >> >> >> >> The bigger problem is that development of syllabi for accommodating >> the use of computers in non computer science subjects has not happened >> in the country (and in most parts of the world). > > > there are many schools / universities many softwares for teaching non > computer science subjects > sorry for not typing completely > > there are many schools / universities using many softwares for teaching non computer science subjects > > ( i am telling about teaching physics , chemistry , biology etc ... which > one you are thinking when u said so ?) > > Some progress has >> happened in Kerala (related reports can be downloaded ...). >> >> The flash part was probably introduced by the 'developer' and was not >> in the original scheme of things. >> >> >> Best >> >> A. Mani >> >> >> >> -- >> A. Mani >> ASL, CLC, AMS, CMS >> http://www.logicamani.co.cc >> _______________________________________________ >> network mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in >> > >
_______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
