Am 2009-03-25 um 20:04 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:53, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:Maybe we should use binaries compiled on 10.4, if they are upwards compatible with 10.5. Mojca, Arthur?Right, but we need to find someone on 10.4 that's willing to contribute. The binaries used to be compiled on 10.4 until now, so obviously they are forward-compatible.
I can offer to build these binaries at work on OSX PPC 10.4For I'm half-time self-employed now, I can do that only about every two weeks.
But my version didn't work, neither with current nor with beta. (see my posting as of 2009-03-25 10:03 GMT+1) Greetlings from Lake Constance! Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
