My previous employer had about 10 Kyocera MFP's under contract. The machines performed as well as any other vendor's machines I've worked with (HP, Canon, Minolta). We did, however, have issues with some of the drivers on the print server (W2k3 box). But driver issues aren't uncommon with other vendors, either.
I'd echo that support and service is really what's important. If the machine performs well most of the time but you have to pull teeth to get decent support, then it's no bargain. I really like the Canon machines we have now but sometimes I think I need to set up a cot for a service tech to stay on site. It seems like it's always two days before they can get someone here. That's what I don't like, and that's what would push me to look elsewhere. Die dulci fruere! Roger Wright ___ On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:21 AM, David Mazzaccaro <[email protected]> wrote: > We recently got a proposal to replace a HP Color LaserJet 3800 with a > Kyocera TASKAlfa 250ci color copier. > I was wondering if anyone had anything good (or bad) to say about Kyocera? > I have no experience with any of their products, but they cost per page > looks very good! > And of course they assure me the quality is equal if not better than the HP. > TIA > > . > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
