Neat still gives better results for me. The new Denoise is generally pretty good but makes it look a bit like shakes median filter. Also it seems to get detail from the red and green channel and puts it in the blue channel (which I think neat might do too) which can change the colour values.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Randy Little <[email protected]>wrote: > If you dont' have denoise tools I have some other chroma tricks that can > work in NUKE as long as you only use the Mask (as one should anyway) > > If you have Maya then you have Toxik andI have seen nothing that denoises > as well as the built in tool in Toxik. that thing is amazing. (well neat > is about as good and works inside of nuke which is much nicer obviously. ) > I haven't had a chance to use nuke 6.3 and the new denoise to compare yet. > Has anyone compared Nukex Denoise with Neat video? > > Randy S. Little > http://www.rslittle.com <http://reel.rslittle.com> > > > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 13:43, Howard Jones <[email protected]>wrote: > >> 800 asa too, tungsten balanced (which I think will add more noise to >> blue). prores 4.4.4 but came out looking like 4.2.2 with so much noise I >> thought I was back on 16mm high asa stock. >> >> What ASA are people recommending, as low as you can go? >> >> Howard >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Howard Jones <[email protected]> >> >> *To:* Nuke user discussion <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Monday, 26 September 2011, 20:28 >> >> *Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] Keying Issues with Alexa >> >> I've just had a terrible time with exactly that format - used the new >> denoise tool which cleaned it up well but was very very noisey to begin with >> - the blue channel was awful. >> >> Howard >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Nick Guth <[email protected]> >> *To:* Nuke user discussion <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Friday, 23 September 2011, 1:56 >> *Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] Keying Issues with Alexa >> >> They were shot to AppleProRes444 (which is the Alexa native format). It's >> straight from the camera in a .mov file format. They were converted to DPX >> and are in the AlexaV3LogC colorspace in nuke. We also tried pulling the raw >> .mov directly into Nuke, but have the exact same result. >> >> -- >> Nick >> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Deke Kincaid <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> What file format we're they shot to and which colorspace? >> >> -deke >> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 17:44, Nick Guth <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Read brought in using AlexaV3LogC. >> > Has anyone had success with keying footage shot on the Alexa? It seems >> to >> > have a weird 422 look, but according to the documents it shoots 444. We >> > brought in the raw .mov from the camera and we're still getting poor >> > results. I attached an example of the before and after (one click key >> with >> > primatte). Why is it keying the edges around highlights? >> > Two of our shows are now shot on this camera and we're having a >> difficult >> > time getting positive results from it. If this was shot on RED it >> wouldn't >> > be a problem. Our work around for now is to roto everything and add >> > selective keys to the roto for details, unfortunately TV schedules don't >> > allow for such detailed workarounds. >> > Any help would be appreciated. Thanks! >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Nuke-users mailing list >> > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Nick Guth >> motion . composite . design >> www.nickguth.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
