I'm gonna try a show wide search for this in all our Nuke comps on Monday.
Will let ya know what I find too.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Diogo Girondi <diogogiro...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I'll look for those in some scripts I have here. But I honestly don't
> remember seeing any of those layers showing up in 6.3v2 and earlier
> versions.
>
>
> On 19/11/2011, at 13:53, Ean Carr <eanc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well, what a coincidence. I just found a script at our facility with this:
>
> add_layer {rgba rgba.beta redguard1.glow}
>
> Fun times.
>
> -Ean
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Ean Carr <eanc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Our little "virus" layer is rgba.beta. Can't seem to get rid of the
>> little rascal. -Ean
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Howard Jones
>> <mrhowardjo...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I've sent this to support - but it could be a legacy thing, I'm on 6.2v2
>>> here so maybe 6.3 has the cure?
>>>
>>> Howard
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Dennis Steinschulte <den...@rebelsofdesign.com>
>>> *To:* Howard Jones <mrhowardjo...@yahoo.com>; Nuke user discussion <
>>> nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk>
>>> *Sent:* Saturday, 19 November 2011, 11:29
>>>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] ??? redguard1.glow ???
>>>
>>> Fun, now that you mention it, I have had reguard and other written words
>>> in my nuke file as well as the RED GREEN BLUE thingie I posted a few days
>>> earlier.
>>> Reading through these posts i have seen some similarities here.
>>> I got an uncorrupted file for a show FileA_uncor with Nuke 6.0.1. There
>>> are python, tcl, expressions and all the "regular" stuff in it. Even with
>>> scripted import and whiteout footage nodes.
>>> Now I have got a new job where i need to get parts of the FileA_uncor. I
>>> copy/paste beaches of trees out of the old into the new Nuke 6.3.2 script.
>>> And after a short SAVE / CLOSE / RESTART NUKE, i have this strange behavior
>>> and i get FileB_cor with all the RED GREE … REGUARD, HORIZONT and other
>>> strange channel names i have never even created.
>>> Creating a fresh nuke 6.3.2 file, everything works as expected.
>>> This corruption even appears, when i copy these branches from 6.3.2 back
>>> into Nuke 6.0.1 .
>>> Ok my head feels dizzy now.
>>> I hope this report is kinda useful…
>>> Dennis
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 19.11.2011, at 11:53, Howard Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> Well I'm buggered - chasing up another issue and suddenly I see
>>> redguard!!
>>> This script corrupted with {rgba.red, rgba.green..} appearing everywhere
>>> which I fixed but every node has ( red green blue) in its label so below id
>>> just from copying a grade node out and there it is!
>>> No Tron Gizmo I'm aware of.
>>>
>>> Howard
>>>
>>> set cut_paste_input [stack 0]
>>> version 6.2 v2
>>> push $cut_paste_input
>>> add_layer {rgb rgb.red rgb.green rgb.blue}
>>> add_layer {rgba rgba.beta redguard1.glow rgba.edgeblur}
>>> add_layer {hilites hilites.red hilites.green hilites.blue hilites.alpha}
>>> Grade {
>>> white {1.933333278 1.684004068 1.478999972 1}
>>> maskChannelInput hilites.green
>>> name Grade145
>>> selected true
>>> xpos -1158
>>> ypos -2623
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Howard Jones <mrhowardjo...@yahoo.com>
>>> *To:* Nuke user discussion <nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk>
>>> *Sent:* Saturday, 19 November 2011, 10:19
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] ??? redguard1.glow ???
>>>
>>> Never seen it so I suspect it's not part of Nuke,
>>> but now I've said that....
>>>
>>> Howard
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Dan Walker <walkerd...@gmail.com>
>>> *To:* Nuke user discussion <nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk>
>>> *Sent:* Saturday, 19 November 2011, 4:47
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] ??? redguard1.glow ???
>>>
>>> I've heard that this could have come from DD. If someone is reusing a
>>> config/resource file home/.nuke and it's coming from another facility,
>>> there is the possibility of contamination.
>>> On Nov 18, 2011 7:56 PM, "Sam Cole" <samb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Could be totally off-base, but I recall that it's a glow gizmo/group
>>> from Tron that people have kept using.
>>>
>>> ./sam
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
