Yeah plugins can be great and all, but working in a big company they are not too keen on installing random plugins that may or may not work 2 weeks before deadline. Especially since it has to be distributed among a number of compers.
G On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Howard Jones <[email protected]>wrote: > Yes all a bit harsh rant. > > Atomkraft is good. If you are pushing nuke that far then you should have a > case for buying it. Otherwise maybe you should be using a dedicated 3d > package in the first place. > > But it does work pretty well, it could be better but then can all > software. I like atomkraft, but it's a bit buggy at the moment. Then again > it's new. > > > Howard > > > On 2 Mar 2013, at 19:28, Marten Blumen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Make sure you send bugs and feedback into Foundry, it's the way software > becomes good. > > IT HAS TO JUST WORK. > > > Unfortunate all software has problems; I've never had any software all > 'just work'. I upgraded the 3d system to AtomKraft to take care of issues; > AK is what Nuke's 3d system will be in a few years. > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > -- ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
