David Bolack wrote: > > > > If they aren't compatible then they can't substitute for the PHB. > >But that is exactly the point. Why on earth would Wizards want a system out > >there that made it so you didn't need the PHB? The ENTIRE point of the D20 > >System Trademark License is to make people buy the PHB. > > This makes it *pointless* to do d20 conversion rules in print, cause you > *can't* tell anyone they are in the book. > "Advanced Creeks&Crawdads Second Edition also contains rules for converting to the third edition of the worlds best selling sword&sorcery gaming system!" ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? FrogGod
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? lizard
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Doug Meerschaert
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? David Bolack
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? John J. Kaufman
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Doug Meerschaert
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Walter Christensen
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? FrogGod
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? lizard
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? William Olander
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? FrogGod
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? FrogGod
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? lizard
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? David Bolack
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Ryan S. Dancey
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? LaPierre, Bob
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? GoldRushG
