>From: "Brad Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > My only assessment would be that it is the community. ie: Kal.
>
>No, the community has no standing to do so, no matter how appropriate it
>might seem at the time. Only the party who's OGC has been closed has any
>standing to seek to have a breach cured. The very best thing the community
>can do is contact the original copyright holder and get them to do it.
>Anything else is just as bad as the original violation.
Hmmmmm.... Thinking very hard about this one. Isn't that like implying a
RESPONSIBILITY for a work you have "opened"? Isn't something "opened"
essentially in the public domain (at least within the framework of the
license)? The original publisher has "cut it loose" STS.
Not sure...
Faust
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
