In a message dated 10/5/01 12:04:36 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< GRG is just setting themselves up to be sued by someone. By inserting themselves into the approval process with a 3rd party license, they're making themselves a target for no benefit. I don't get it. It's the exact opposite of what they should be doing. >> How so (in your opinion)? People who are inclined to use the system for projets will do so. But if they want to use a mark owned by a third party they can do so, but will have to prove that they have the written permission to do so. It's little different from the D20 System License, excep that rather than going by the "honor system," we're requiring verification. At least this is the *intent* thus far. Obviously nothing has been drafted, reviewed or finalized by our legal folks. Mark Arsenault President, Gold Rush Entertainment, Inc. | http://www.goldrushg.com Executive Director, The Game Publishers Assoc. | http://www.thegpa.org ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 20% off all design & publishing packages! http://www.goldenpillarpublishing.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
