> Reginald Cablayan > > I don't think you need a minimum, other than using the OGL. > > But what other control can you put with an OGL icon? Some may > criticize that > the logo would create a set of canon among OGC. For example, a > standardized > firearms rule that should everyon should follow using this scale when > applying this icon to your product.
And who decides what is canon? First-to-print is a terrible standard. No, the only thing an OGL logo can represent is that the product contains OGC. The 5% OGC is the only thing that has any meaning. Otherwise you could use the OGL and produce a work that has no OGC, just PI and closed content. THAT would be a true disservice to the mark, and what we should be concerned about. The only reason a publisher would use such a mark is if they believe it will increase sales because of some sort of buyer perception that Open is Good. More realistically, they will use the logo to indicate that Open means D&D Compatible, which is exactly what the d20 logo is supposed to do. -Brad _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
