>From: "Justin Bacon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [FAUST SAID] >>You seem to be speaking from a *very* uninformed standpoint on several >>issues here. > >To put it politely: Bullshit.
That is not polite. >I've noticed you have a penchant for accusing anyone who disagrees with you >of being "uninformed" or "ignorant". Actually you're wrong. This is the first time in perhaps 18 months that I have made any such statement to anyone on these boards. You are thinking of the OTHER people who have been making similar statements in response to your comments. I have largely been refraining from commenting on your posts because you show such a depth of prejudice in your broad, all encompassing generalizations that it is not worth bothering. The notions you are expressing - that products are flawed because they don't meet YOUR standards of openness and clarity - are simply incorrect, and they don't apply in the broad, sweeping, generalized way you are using them. There is another example of your seemingly complete lack of information about what you are talking about. Sword and Sorcery studios has - without question - contributed more open content than any other company. Thay have in fact (by word count) "officially" contributed more than WotC - although that will change when the SRD spells are released. How do I know this? I know this because I have on my desktop here a file contain ALL of S&S's contributed content. I did not find the incredible difficulties you are describing in extracting the PI. Faust _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
