There are more than enough data points to _infer_ that a humanoid mind flayer is a valid form.
On 1/14/02 7:04 PM, Ryan S. Dancey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > >You've confused "items in a set" with "items in a pattern". There are >items in the set of humanoid who advance by class. That does not mean >that the pattern "creatures that advance by class are humanoid by >default" is accurate. There are not enough data points available to >draw that conclusion. The missing data point would be a rule that said >"characters that advance by class are huamanoid by default". Absent >that rule, all you have is a coincidence. -- Russ Taylor (http://www.cmc.net/~rtaylor/) "Remember, you can't spell obsequious without I. O. U." -- Patty _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
