>From: Clark Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I will chime in. That was a great post. Discussing the
>law is great.
>
>You didnt pretend to be an authority. You didnt say
>"go ahead and do it since rules cant be copyrighted"
>or some other overly generalized principle that has no
>specific bearing on the issue in question. I dont ever
>have a problem with talking about the law. The problem
>I have is when people express clear (and incorrect)
>opinions as if they know what they are talking about.
Hey, feel free to slam my last post where I gave my (somewhat vitriolic)
opinion about how developers should treat companies with unclear OGC
designations.
I am a little sick of picking up D20 products and seeing:
"the only open content in this product is the game rules
that are directlky derivative of the D20 SRD."
Faust
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
