On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Clark Peterson wrote: > OK you guys, you lost me with the double negative > thing. Do we have consensus on what the best option is > for referring to SSS stuff? Yes, presume it is PI even > if it is just non-OGC in the original product.
I think listing the items and stating which specific elements (I'm assuming it's mostly their names, perhaps also physical descriptions) of each are PI is the best approach. That way you've just got the one general statement about the text being OGC and all the specific statements are concering PI. I think Sixten's previous language was the best: 5. The following listed content is taken from publications of Sword & Sorcery Studios. The names of these items, and any descriptions or depictions [obviously add in any other elements that need to be protected], are designated as Product Identity, and are used here by specific permission of Sword & Sorcery Studios: from Creature Collection,"monster 1"; from Creature Collection 2: Dark Menagerie, "monster 2"; from Relics & Rituals, "spell 1," "spell 2," "item 1" Once again I changed derived (to taken) and then added the note in []s in case there are elements we aren't think of. alec _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
