>Steve wrote: > >"The feat name when I use it isn't derivative of the >SRD because it's from Tome and Blood and isn't even in >the SRD" > >Youre missing my point, which is waht I was afraid of. > >Ofcourse Tome and Blood isnt in the SRD. > >WotC can create D&D material without the OGL. > >You cant. > >So if you reference a new feat--because you must be >relying on the mechanics of the game as detailed in >the SRD even if the feat itself is not in the SRD--it >is derivative and thus covered by teh OGL. And since >you dont have the right to contribute that material as >it is copyright WotC in Tome and Blood you cant >contribute it. Thus, you would be in violation of the >license.
but "Divine Might" can't be copyrighted, and i rather doubt it's a trademark [and if it is, it's unclaimed in the source material, so you can at least argue that you infringed unwittingly--but that's a separate issue]. -- woodelf <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://webpages.charter.net/woodelph/ If any religion is right, maybe they all have to be right. Maybe God doesn't care how you say your prayers, just as long as you say them. --Sinclair _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
