Clark Peterson wrote: >The OGL could be more clearly written on this point, >but it is not. >
I agree with Clark. In an ambiguous point like this, the best response might be for WotC to render an opnion on the matter in one direction or another by slightly altering the OGL. My suggestions: Chainging deinition (g) to read either : "Use", "Used" or "Using" means to use, Distribute, copy, edit, format, modify, translate, reference, and otherwise create Derivative Material of Open Game Content. or "Use", "Used" or "Using" means to use, Distribute, copy, edit, format, modify, translate and otherwise create Derivative Material of Open Game Content, but specifically not the act of referencing someone else's work. Or maybe changing item 5 to read: 5.Representation of Authority to Contribute: If You are contributing original material as Open Game Content, You represent that Your Contributions are Your original creation and/or You have sufficient rights to grant the rights conveyed by this License. You also represent that you original material contains no references to anyone else's original material to which you do not have Authority to Contribute. DM. _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
