On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Alec A. Burkhardt wrote: > ?? I thought you were the one who thought there shouldn't be two sets of > negatives. :) And since Clark said not to assume any previous non-OGC > could be called PI now, I'm in favor of your earlier designation of the PI > elements of the items taken from CC, CC2 & RR.
Just pointing out my grammar error - remove the 'not' fromthe second sentence. Clark said we could just treat any non-OGC material as PI. alec (who needs a break from the computer obvioulsy) _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
