We do conduct user polls regularly, you can see the most recent one results here:
https://blog.openmandriva.org/en/2014/11/user-survey-2014-results/ On 7Jan, 2015, at 7:02 PM, symbianflo wrote: > I guess here is the problem, you shouldn't ask us . > IMO even you are thinking like the old mdv people (no pun intended), > ....what does change what I or anybody else here > want OMA to be, for the end-user?We still force the user to accept > what OMA offers. > I've started a campaign of package request fixings, until it was told me that > my work is useless ,so IMO what OMA has to be must be decided by the > people who install it. > You know that everything should be done just to gain users that install and > talk about OMA, period. > So, what I'm saying all your questions should be asked to those and not to us. > Make a quiz and everybody here translate and publish the poll on their > community's forum. > I can do that , and I guess MIB too, what about the others? > > > Il 07/01/2015 13:48, Guilherme Moro ha scritto: >> Hi, >> >> just a little intervention here :) >> >> Again I see people acting defensively against Per comments, so I'll shift >> the conversation a little bit so maybe it can get clearer for all involved. >> So to start a proper conversation about what OMA should do to raise money >> and be noticed I'll ask each one that have interest to mail the answer for >> this question: >> >> What exactly is the goal of OMA ? >> >> And I really expect objective answers only, I know most people think that >> the goal is to succeed, but succeed in what? Do you want to be a Desktop >> distro? For what kind of user? Do you want to add value to ARM users, how? >> Do you want to focus in enterprise distros? Desktop or Server then? Do you >> want to be an easy to use distro, if yes, why you think OMA distro is the >> answer and must focus on that, if there are tons of distros around, >> including ROSA that is going forward on the Desktop area much quicker than >> we are. >> >> After answering this question clearly, not for me, not for Per, but for >> yourselves, we can then start a proper conversation and critique of the >> current structure and process. >> >> And again I urge you, be clear, direct and pragmatic, this is not an answer >> to the criticisms, is just a honest answer to yourself. >> >> Regarding the topic at hand, if you don't have the answer to this question, >> how you want to ask people for money in a crowdfunding? If you read the >> crowd page as someone that never heard about OMA, you see that there's no >> clear goal of what the money would be used to, so I find hard anyone would >> contribute anything. >> >> Regards, >> >> Guilherme Moro >> >> >> >> On 29 December 2014 at 21:08, Blackcrack <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Am 29.12.2014 um 15:06 schrieb Per Øyvind Karlsen: >>> 2014-12-28 13:34 GMT+01:00 Tomasz Gajc <[email protected]>: >>> Per everybody can criticise, >>> >>> True, but not constructively. >>> but not everybody can change anything. >>> Most certainly, which is why constructive criticism is of prime value for >>> not doing things twrong. >>> So blaming around the house all people is not a desired attitude, hope this >>> will tell you something. >>> >>> Noone is blaming, this is called constructive criticism and not blaming for >>> a reason. >>> If you want a crowd of yay-sayers without the ability to change anything >>> and leave it at that, then fine, but then you're all on your own and lost >>> before you've even begun. >>> >>> I'm offering to help, both in the form of advice on thing to do and really >>> not do, only thing I'm saying is untill certain issues has been resolved, >>> my contributions are limited to harm reduction, which should be appreciated >>> regardless of it not being the thing most people behind something wants >>> to hear. >>> >>> FWIW majority of the active cooker contributors and several OMA community >>> has approached me for several months now with concerns and discontent over >>> the current situation, that should say something, obviously I'm not the >>> only one "blaming", I only chose to do so in public. >>> >>> --- >>> Regards >>> Per Øyvind >> >> i see it same, constructive critic it's more worth as something try to >> blame. ! >> and i see Per's words also more as critic in constructive form.. >> @ Per Øyvind, Per, try to make an membership on/in OM ... and so on .. >> for have the possible to determine with and then draw the whole thing in the >> right direction.. >> and have the possible for do this . . >> >> and for all other's there, again, what do you are think, why i ever pray to >> make fast as possible >> an real Mandrake-installer to build, in which language it is, it's really >> all the same for the enduser, >> the thing it is, to have the possible for custom install and on any way, >> burn the Cd on Iso or move it >> on usb or maybe an 2 Disk-online installer to have like it was in the first >> times.. >> easy an easy possible for custom install and maybe also directly online >> install (and not need donloading isos') >> and an well and easy working custom install directly down from the ftp's, >> and this was also an part of Mandrake , why have mandrake and mandriva so >> big success .. >> and as next the thing with drakconf without this both components be Mandrake >> not really mandrake, >> and only mandrake was loved from the whole peoples and have an had success >> by the whole peoples.. >> >> 1. easy install, if possible directly from the ftp's/http's sources/mirrors >> via usb-stick or an small 40mb iso in any way .. where can boot the iso .. >> >> The own, custom System, where can install, like the enduser whant, and not >> only kde ! >> and this is the best system also for Providers also ! Because they are can >> easy as possible setting up an Webserver for customers . >> >> 2. easy to configuration with one Control centre . >> where should be include Virtual Domains and User-webspace who should be >> possible >> And the Workstation for others who need an only an workstation with Yellow >> Pages (NIS) >> or the Other, in an Factory, an LDAP System for Manny employee or customer >> or how ever.. >> the next thing it is, Notebook install, an surface for notebook, what at >> moment standart it is.. >> but this is an Notebook Surface and not an Desktop for anybody.. i hate it, >> i kick the OMV Taksbar directly away and use the Standard-KDe Taskbar. >> and many other configurations who be possible with an Installer who it is >> possible for an real Custom install . >> >> Easy, just for any an possible custom system . an Custom System for anybody, >> but there mus simply be the installer voices and be right. >> >> An RPM-releated installer .. >> >> best regards >> Blacky >> >> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OM-Cooker mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OM-Cooker mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OM-Cooker mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
_______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
