On 1/8/07, Nicholas S-A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Documented Video Project ?
>
> My philosophy has been to show focus first, and then broaden when you
> can do it safely. I believe there's value in remaining a "Graphics"
> project for a few reasons. One is that it's a sore spot in the FOSS
> community, moreso than for any other kind of peripheral, and it will
> always be that kind of issue. The other is that it shows that we're
> not getting distrated by so many neat ideas that we never actually
> make anything. Once the Graphics side has been established, we can
> create another "Project" that does "everything else," but we should
> always have the Graphics project as an anchor.
How about Open Documented Graphics Initiative, and for the other
projects
we could use Open Documented Project Initiative?
Or just Documented Graphics Initiative/Documented Project Initiative.
(I prefer the second one just because it isn't quite as nasty to say,
but it also
might tote its crowning benefit strongly enough)
You're getting the idea. But we should be careful to use the word
"Free" or something like it (Liberated, Freedom, Libre, etc.), rather
than Open, because RMS is being nice to us, and he wants us to do
that.
--
Timothy Miller
http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~millerti
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
