On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Jonas Bonn <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 09:30 +0100, Julius Baxter wrote: > >> I'm inclined to put in an extension or something in the OR1K spec >> saying that delay slots are optional and machines without delay slots >> should set bit X in SPR Y. What do we think? >> > > Whether or not you have delay slots needs to be known at compile time...
Sure (by the way I would hope we can maintain a single compiler port and just pass a -mno-delay-slots or something, which should have a multilib option) but I'm just saying we would also need to have it detectable by software. Julius _______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
