Yes, we all appreciate it for sure, if Adobe provides documentation, open source software, breeze conferences and open source friendly eulas.
On the other hand, i would not like to have the feeling to owe them something. In fact, if Adobe is clever, they know, that unconditionally supporting osflash is good for Flash and thus themself. I'm pretty confident, that developer centric people like Mike Chambers see it in similar ways. I'm not so sure about the marketing people, though. Cheers, Ralf. Peter Elst wrote: > I can definitely see your point Ralf -- its probably not a question of > choosing one or the other, there is no reason why we couldn't be > independent user groups and have a close affiliation with Adobe. > > Cheers, > Peter > > > Ralf Bokelberg wrote: > >>I didn't want to sound harsh, nor did i want to create a us vs. them >>discussion. I can also see a lot of openness and support on MM's end >>lately, but i think it's good for osflash to be as independent as >>possible. If someone wants to join a Adobe group, i'm sure they have >>more than enough groups to choose from. >> >>Cheers, >>Ralf. >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
