I also notice that the lack of vibration is better than a MZ-3, but, I also
use a Nikon F-100, and find it terribily calm...and much less
louder...becuse it is big and has coreless motors
Clover
Still waiting for a MZ-Sn
----- Original Message -----
From: "P�l Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: jeudi 9 ao�t 2001 22:27
Subject: Re: The MZ-S; a batteryholic?
> Max wrote:
>
> > But on the positive side, I must say the camera is a delight to use.
> > The complete lack of shutter vibration that Pal mentioned earlier is
just
> > amazing, and instantly relegates the Z1-p to the obsolete category.
> > It's that good!
>
>
> It is. The lack of vibration, which really makes a difference with super
telephotos, and the much better viewfinder made me sell of my Z-1p. I can't
focus the 600/4 + the 2X-L converter with the Z-1p. With the MZ-S its no
problem in daylight and this made me decide to keep my 2X-L converter. I
shot some more black guillemots today with this combo and I had no problem.
Unfortunately, I punctured my Zodiac :-(
>
>
> > What I don't like is not being able to use it with my AF500FTZ and
> > dial in the flash compensation.
>
>
> Turn the command dial so that you go into manual mode. Dial in exposure
compensation. Then you have flash compensation. When finished, press the
green button and reset compensation.
>
>
> P�l
>
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
