Bruce -
It also involves, I would thing - model's releases and the fear of the 
bride not wanting her photo
out there on line.....

I would never enter a portrait of anyone in a photo contest, myself, 
unless I had a full release from
the subject and it wasn't a posed for shot someone asked me to take for 
them.  

I think they are being cautious..

ann


Bruce Dayton wrote:

>Probably just my own complaining, but I do continue to see a large
>slant towards outdoor (scenic) and street photography.  One real downside to
>'artists' voting before the judges even get a crack at it, is those
>biases can come out.  For example, after seeing about 400 dragonflies
>and butterflies I tend to be a little harsher in my judgements.  I
>also tend to be a little critical of photos of art - statues,
>paintings, etc.  As near as I can tell from timing of
>acceptance/rejection, it appears that there is a tally of votes on a
>photo - when it reaches a threshold of either accept or reject, the
>photo is taken out of the voting.  The rejects are simply rejected
>without judge intervention and the accepted are then put on hold (not
>actual status) waiting for the judges to decide.
>
>So technically excellent studio or wedding work will largely go
>unnoticed unless it involves a beautiful girl.
>
>Case in point - I had submitted the recent bridal portrait shot I show
>here, prior to showing on the list.  It was rejected within hours -
>which would indicate the judges had not even seen it (the judges take
>much longer to get to a photo than that - usually days).  I then
>showed it on list here and got a very strong positive response to it
>from people I would consider pretty critical.  So I decided to
>resubmit it to see what would happen.  This time it took a little
>longer to reject, but it did get rejected in a time frame that would
>lead me to believe the judges did not see it.
>
>I guess the real problem with a gallery like that is no one wants to
>see quality work of other humans unless then know them.  Since they
>don't know them, it needs to be more like a NG shot of a beggar or a
>small child which all of us relate to.
>
>Anyway, just some thoughts.
>
>  
>



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to